On 8/10/23 12:09, Patrick Palka wrote:
Booststrapped and regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for
trunk and perhaps 13?
-- >8 --
We shouldn't issue a "declared static but never defined" warning
for a deduction guide (declared in an anonymous namespace).
PR c++/106604
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* decl.cc (wrapup_namespace_globals): Don't issue a
-Wunused-function warning for a deduction guide.
Maybe instead of special casing this here we could set DECL_INITIAL on
deduction guides so they look defined?
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction116.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/decl.cc | 1 +
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction116.C | 8 ++++++++
2 files changed, 9 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction116.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/decl.cc b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
index 792ab330dd0..9fe3a0b98fd 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/decl.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/decl.cc
@@ -856,6 +856,7 @@ wrapup_namespace_globals ()
&& !TREE_PUBLIC (decl)
&& !DECL_ARTIFICIAL (decl)
&& !DECL_FRIEND_PSEUDO_TEMPLATE_INSTANTIATION (decl)
+ && !deduction_guide_p (decl)
&& !warning_suppressed_p (decl, OPT_Wunused_function))
warning_at (DECL_SOURCE_LOCATION (decl),
OPT_Wunused_function,
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction116.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction116.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..00f6d5fef41
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1z/class-deduction116.C
@@ -0,0 +1,8 @@
+// PR c++/106604
+// { dg-do compile { target c++17 } }
+// { dg-additional-options "-Wunused-function" }
+
+namespace {
+ template<class T> struct A { A(...); };
+ A(bool) -> A<bool>; // { dg-bogus "never defined" }
+}