On 8/7/23 18:45, Jeff Law wrote: > > > On 8/7/23 04:32, Arsen Arsenović via Gcc-patches wrote: >> From: Luis Machado <luis.mach...@arm.com> >> >> With a recent import of gnulib, code has been pulled that tests and enables >> 64-bit time_t by default on 32-bit hosts that support it. >> >> Although gdb can use the gnulib support, bfd doesn't use gnulib and currently >> doesn't do these checks. >> >> As a consequence, if we have a 32-bit host that supports 64-bit time_t, we'll >> have a mismatch between gdb's notion of time_t and bfd's notion of time_t. >> >> This will lead to mismatches in the struct stat size, leading to memory >> corruption and crashes. >> >> This patch disables the year 2038 check for now, which makes things work >> reliably again. >> >> I'd consider this a temporary fix until we have proper bfd checks for the >> year >> 2038, if it makes sense. 64-bit hosts seems to be more common these days, so >> I'm not sure how important it is to have this support enabled and how soon >> we want to enable it. >> >> Thoughts? >> >> ChangeLog: >> >> * configure.ac: Disable year2038 by default on 32-bit hosts. >> * configure: Regenerate. > OK. Though I thought gnulib ended up reverting some of this work. > > Jeff
I sent this a little while ago. It may be possible that things have changed in gnulib since then. This was mostly addressing issues building binutils-gdb with a 32-bit hosts and enabling all targets.