On Mon, 7 Aug 2023, Uros Bizjak wrote: > On Mon, Jul 31, 2023 at 11:40?AM Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: > > > > On Sun, 30 Jul 2023, Uros Bizjak wrote: > > > > > Also introduce -m[no-]mmxfp-with-sse option to disable trapping V2SF > > > named patterns in order to avoid generation of partial vector V4SFmode > > > trapping instructions. > > > > > > The new option is enabled by default, because even with sanitization, > > > a small but consistent speed up of 2 to 3% with Polyhedron capacita > > > benchmark can be achieved vs. scalar code. > > > > > > Using -fno-trapping-math improves Polyhedron capacita runtime 8 to 9% > > > vs. scalar code. This is what clang does by default, as it defaults > > > to -fno-trapping-math. > > > > I like the new option, note you lack invoke.texi documentation where > > I'd also elaborate a bit on the interaction with -fno-trapping-math > > and the possible performance impact then NaNs or denormals leak > > into the upper halves and cross-reference -mdaz-ftz. > > The attached doc patch is invoke.texi entry for -mmmxfp-with-sse > option. It is written in a way to also cover half-float vectors. WDYT?
"generate trapping floating-point operations" I'd say "generate floating-point operations that might affect the set of floating point status flags", the word "trapping" is IMHO misleading. Not sure if "set of floating point status flags" is the correct term, but it's what the C standard seems to refer to when talking about things you get with fegetexceptflag. feraieexcept refers to "floating-point exceptions". Unfortunately the -fno-trapping-math documentation is similarly confusing (and maybe even wrong, I read it to conform to 'non-stop' IEEE arithmetic). I'd maybe give an example of a FP operation that's _not_ affected by the flag (copysign?). Otherwise it looks OK to me. Thanks, Richard.
