Applied to master, thanks! --Philipp.
On Mon, 7 Aug 2023 at 19:20, Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On 8/7/23 05:31, Manolis Tsamis wrote: > > The stack pointer propagation fix 736f8fd3 turned out to be more restrictive > > than needed by rejecting propagation of the stack pointer when REG_POINTER > > didn't match. > > > > This commit removes this check: > > When the stack pointer is propagated it is fine for this to result in > > REG_POINTER becoming true from false, which is what the original code > > checked. > > > > This simplification makes the previously introduced function > > maybe_copy_reg_attrs obsolete and the logic can be inlined at the call > > sites, > > as it was before 736f8fd3. > > > > gcc/ChangeLog: > > > > * regcprop.cc (maybe_copy_reg_attrs): Remove unnecessary function. > > (find_oldest_value_reg): Inline stack_pointer_rtx check. > > (copyprop_hardreg_forward_1): Inline stack_pointer_rtx check. > OK > jeff
