Hi,
On 06/11/2010 10:23 PM, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
On 11 August 2009 02:01, Joseph S. Myers<jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote:
On Tue, 11 Aug 2009, Manuel López-Ibáñez wrote:
Modified the patch to make use of the new c-c++-common testsuite.
Bootstrapped and regression tested on x86_64-linux-gnu.
OK for trunk?
I still think the warnings for these cases are mostly correct (there are
cases where you may be able to make deductions about the range of possible
values of the expression being converted) and appropriate, and if disabled
should be disabled under some separate -Wno-conversion-whatever option.
-Wno-conversion-after-promotion ?
I am not sure what would be a good name, but I think it is worth to
allow silencing these warnings, so suggestions are welcome.
it looks like this PR is still open today, and I think resolving it one
way or the other isn't much work... Thus I'm asking: shall we actually
have a new -Wno-conversion-after-promotion? Or, alternately - the issue
came up quite often in recent times, because other widespread compilers
don't warn - suppress the warning only in case of conditional expressions:
char
foo(bool haveBar, char bar_)
{
return haveBar ? bar_ : 0;
};
What do you think?
Thanks,
Paolo.
