On Tue, Aug 1, 2023 at 2:36 AM Patrick Palka via Gcc-patches
<gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
>
> Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, does this look OK for trunk?
>
> -- >8 --
>
> In the C++ front end, a COMPONENT_REF's second operand isn't always a
> decl (at least at template parse time).  This patch makes the generic
> pretty printer not ICE when printing such a COMPONENT_REF.
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
>         * tree-pretty-print.cc (dump_generic_node) <case COMPONENT_REF>:
>         Don't call component_ref_field_offset if the RHS isn't a decl.
> ---
>  gcc/tree-pretty-print.cc | 16 +++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/tree-pretty-print.cc b/gcc/tree-pretty-print.cc
> index 25d191b10fd..da8dd002a3b 100644
> --- a/gcc/tree-pretty-print.cc
> +++ b/gcc/tree-pretty-print.cc
> @@ -2482,14 +2482,16 @@ dump_generic_node (pretty_printer *pp, tree node, int 
> spc, dump_flags_t flags,
>        if (op_prio (op0) < op_prio (node))
>         pp_right_paren (pp);
>        pp_string (pp, str);
> -      dump_generic_node (pp, TREE_OPERAND (node, 1), spc, flags, false);
> -      op0 = component_ref_field_offset (node);
> -      if (op0 && TREE_CODE (op0) != INTEGER_CST)
> -       {
> -         pp_string (pp, "{off: ");
> -             dump_generic_node (pp, op0, spc, flags, false);
> +      op1 = TREE_OPERAND (node, 1);
> +      dump_generic_node (pp, op1, spc, flags, false);
> +      if (DECL_P (op1))

OK if you add a comment before this test.

> +       if (tree off = component_ref_field_offset (node))
> +         if (TREE_CODE (off) != INTEGER_CST)
> +           {
> +             pp_string (pp, "{off: ");
> +             dump_generic_node (pp, off, spc, flags, false);
>               pp_right_brace (pp);
> -       }
> +           }
>        break;
>
>      case BIT_FIELD_REF:
> --
> 2.41.0.478.gee48e70a82
>

Reply via email to