Yes. We want to be consistent. I am planning to change all previous "LEN_MASK_*" into "MASK_LEN_*"
juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai From: Robin Dapp Date: 2023-07-20 14:22 To: juzhe.zhong; gcc-patches CC: rdapp.gcc; richard.sandiford; rguenther Subject: Re: [PATCH] VECT: Support floating-point in-order reduction for length loop control Hi Juzhe, I just noticed that we recently started calling things MASK_LEN (instead of LEN_MASK before) with the reductions. Wouldn't we want to be consistent here? Especially as the length takes precedence. I realize the preparational work like optabs is already upstream but still wanted to bring it up. Regards Robin
