On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 9:32 AM Andrew Pinski <pins...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 12:16 AM Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
> <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Jul 19, 2023 at 3:53 AM Andrew Pinski via Gcc-patches
> > <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > So I had missed/forgot that EQ_EXPR could have an non boolean
> > > type for generic when I implemented r14-2556-g0407ae8a7732d9.
> > > This patch adds check for one bit precision intergal type
> > > which fixes the problem.
> > >
> > > OK? Bootstrapped and tested on x86_64-linux-gnu with no regressions.
> > >
> > >         PR tree-optimization/110726
> > >
> > > gcc/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > >         * match.pd ((a|b)&(a==b),a|(a==b),(a&b)|(a==b)):
> > >         Add checks to make sure the type was one bit precision
> > >         intergal type.
> > >
> > > gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
> > >
> > >         * gcc.c-torture/execute/bitops-1.c: New test.
> > > ---
> > >  gcc/match.pd                                  | 12 +++++--
> > >  .../gcc.c-torture/execute/bitops-1.c          | 33 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  2 files changed, 42 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > >  create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/bitops-1.c
> > >
> > > diff --git a/gcc/match.pd b/gcc/match.pd
> > > index 054e6585876..4dfe92623f7 100644
> > > --- a/gcc/match.pd
> > > +++ b/gcc/match.pd
> > > @@ -1229,7 +1229,9 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
> > >  /* (a | b) & (a == b)  -->  a & b (boolean version of the above).  */
> > >  (simplify
> > >   (bit_and:c (bit_ior @0 @1) (nop_convert? (eq:c @0 @1)))
> > > - (bit_and @0 @1))
> > > + (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@0))
> >
> > that's really a constraint on 'type', not sure if it would be clearer
> > to test that.
> > What's the nop_convert you've seen in practice here?  With integer 
> > comparison
> > result shouldn't those be convert? instead?
>
> The case were nop_convert happen would happen is:
> ```
> struct f
> {
>   signed a:1;
>   signed b:1;
>   signed c:1;
> };
>
> void f(struct f t, struct f *t1)
> {
>   t.c = (t.a == t.b);
>   t1->c =   (t.a | t.b) & t.c;
> }
> ```
> I know the above does not show up much but it definitely can show up.
>
> In the testcase in the bug report the EQ_EXPR didn't have convert
> around it but the type was just changed to be the long type and we
> cannot treat the `a == b` similar as `~(a^b)` which is only works for
> 1 bit integers (unsigned or signed).

I see, the patch is OK then.

Thanks,
Richard.

> Thanks,
> Andrew Pinski
>
> >
> > > +      && TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@0)) == 1)
> > > +  (bit_and @0 @1)))
> > >
> > >  /* a | ~(a ^ b)  -->  a | ~b  */
> > >  (simplify
> > > @@ -1239,7 +1241,9 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
> > >  /* a | (a == b)  -->  a | (b^1) (boolean version of the above). */
> > >  (simplify
> > >   (bit_ior:c @0 (nop_convert? (eq:c @0 @1)))
> > > - (bit_ior @0 (bit_xor @1 { build_one_cst (type); })))
> > > + (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@0))
> > > +      && TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@0)) == 1)
> > > +  (bit_ior @0 (bit_xor @1 { build_one_cst (type); }))))
> > >
> > >  /* (a | b) | (a &^ b)  -->  a | b  */
> > >  (for op (bit_and bit_xor)
> > > @@ -1255,7 +1259,9 @@ DEFINE_INT_AND_FLOAT_ROUND_FN (RINT)
> > >  /* (a & b) | (a == b)  -->  a == b  */
> > >  (simplify
> > >   (bit_ior:c (bit_and:c @0 @1) (nop_convert?@2 (eq @0 @1)))
> > > - @2)
> > > + (if (INTEGRAL_TYPE_P (TREE_TYPE (@0))
> > > +      && TYPE_PRECISION (TREE_TYPE (@0)) == 1)
> > > +  @2))
> > >
> > >  /* ~(~a & b)  -->  a | ~b  */
> > >  (simplify
> > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/bitops-1.c 
> > > b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/bitops-1.c
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 00000000000..cfaa6b9fd26
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/execute/bitops-1.c
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@
> > > +/* PR tree-optimization/110726 */
> > > +
> > > +#define DECLS(n,VOL)                   \
> > > +__attribute__((noinline,noclone))      \
> > > +int h##n(VOL int A, VOL int B){                \
> > > +    return (A | B) & (A == B);         \
> > > +}                                      \
> > > +__attribute__((noinline,noclone))      \
> > > +int i##n(VOL int A, VOL int B){                \
> > > +    return A | (A == B);               \
> > > +}                                      \
> > > +__attribute__((noinline,noclone))      \
> > > +int k##n(VOL int A, VOL int B){                \
> > > +    return (A & B) | (A == B);         \
> > > +}                                      \
> > > +
> > > +DECLS(0,)
> > > +DECLS(1,volatile)
> > > +
> > > +int values[] = { 0, 1, 2, 3, -1, -2, -3, 0x10080 };
> > > +int numvalues = sizeof(values)/sizeof(values[0]);
> > > +
> > > +int main(){
> > > +    for(int A = 0; A < numvalues; A++)
> > > +      for(int B = 0; B < numvalues; B++)
> > > +       {
> > > +         int a = values[A];
> > > +         int b = values[B];
> > > +         if (h0 (a, b) != h1 (a, b)) __builtin_abort();
> > > +         if (i0 (a, b) != i1 (a, b)) __builtin_abort();
> > > +         if (k0 (a, b) != k1 (a, b)) __builtin_abort();
> > > +       }
> > > +}
> > > --
> > > 2.31.1
> > >

Reply via email to