Hi, try_peel_loop uses gimple_duplicate_loop_body_to_header_edge which subtracts the profile from the original loop. However then it tries to scale the profile in a wrong way (it forces header count to be entry count).
This eliminates to profile misupdates in the internal loop of sphinx3. gcc/ChangeLog: PR middle-end/110649 * tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc (try_peel_loop): Avoid double profile update. diff --git a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc index 0117dbfc91b..bdb738af7a8 100644 --- a/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc +++ b/gcc/tree-ssa-loop-ivcanon.cc @@ -1152,6 +1152,7 @@ try_peel_loop (class loop *loop, } if (may_be_zero) bitmap_clear_bit (wont_exit, 1); + if (!gimple_duplicate_loop_body_to_header_edge ( loop, loop_preheader_edge (loop), npeel, wont_exit, exit, &edges_to_remove, DLTHE_FLAG_UPDATE_FREQ)) @@ -1168,18 +1169,6 @@ try_peel_loop (class loop *loop, adjust_loop_info_after_peeling (loop, npeel, true); profile_count entry_count = profile_count::zero (); - edge e; - edge_iterator ei; - FOR_EACH_EDGE (e, ei, loop->header->preds) - if (e->src != loop->latch) - { - if (e->src->count.initialized_p ()) - entry_count += e->src->count; - gcc_assert (!flow_bb_inside_loop_p (loop, e->src)); - } - profile_probability p; - p = entry_count.probability_in (loop->header->count); - scale_loop_profile (loop, p, -1); bitmap_set_bit (peeled_loops, loop->num); return true; }