On Mon, 2023-07-10 at 10:33 +0000, Richard Biener wrote:
> On Fri, 7 Jul 2023, Xi Ruoyao wrote:
>
> > If a bit-field is signed and it's wider than the output type, we
> > must
> > ensure the extracted result sign-extended. But this was not handled
> > correctly.
> >
> > For example:
> >
> > int x : 8;
> > long y : 55;
> > bool z : 1;
> >
> > The vectorized extraction of y was:
> >
> > vect__ifc__49.29_110 =
> > MEM <vector(2) long unsigned int> [(struct Item
> > *)vectp_a.27_108];
> > vect_patt_38.30_112 =
> > vect__ifc__49.29_110 & { 9223372036854775552,
> > 9223372036854775552 };
> > vect_patt_39.31_113 = vect_patt_38.30_112 >> 8;
> > vect_patt_40.32_114 =
> > VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<vector(2) long int>(vect_patt_39.31_113);
> >
> > This is obviously incorrect. This pach has implemented it as:
> >
> > vect__ifc__25.16_62 =
> > MEM <vector(2) long unsigned int> [(struct Item
> > *)vectp_a.14_60];
> > vect_patt_31.17_63 =
> > VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<vector(2) long int>(vect__ifc__25.16_62);
> > vect_patt_32.18_64 = vect_patt_31.17_63 << 1;
> > vect_patt_33.19_65 = vect_patt_32.18_64 >> 9;
>
> OK.
Pushed r14-2407 and r13-7553.
--
Xi Ruoyao <xry...@xry111.site>
School of Aerospace Science and Technology, Xidian University
