Hello, Ping for http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-04/msg00274.html
Thanks in advance, Olivier On Apr 5, 2012, at 14:54 , Olivier Hainque wrote: ... > install-no-fixedincludes remains a useful Makefile target > and it misbehaves in two ways: > > 1) past the second invocation, it rebuilds a lot of things > un-necessarily (because the first invocation touches stamps > it should preserve) > > 2) it does install the contents of 'include-fixed' while part of > it's purpose is precisely not to ... > The attached patch is a proposal to fix this, moving details to the gcc/ > Makefile where they belong (as suggested in the aforementioned thread), > and adding explicit targets+comments to clarify what is going on. ... > * Makefile.tpl (gcc-no-fixedincludes): Rename into ... > (gcc-install-no-fixedincludes): Forwarder to local target in gcc/ > * Makefile.in: Regenerate. > > gcc/ > * Makefile.in (install-no-fixedincludes): New target. Former toplevel > gcc-no-fixedincludes, interlacing stmp-int-hdrs and install with ... > (stash-maybefixed-headers, restore-header-stamps, > restore-maybefixed-headers): New subtargets. Add -p to cp syslimits.h. > Stash and restore include-fixed as well as include. > (stmp-int-hdrs): Use move-if-change + cp -p to setup fix_dir/limits.h.
