Re: [PATCH] Basic asm blocks should always be volatile

[Julian Waters via Gcc-patches]

Hi all,

I've revised the change to be much neater

>From 480954bc7d2b24e5d19a98260a2be0b49e112c42 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: TheShermanTanker <tanksherma...@gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 28 Jun 2023 19:11:34 +0800
Subject: [PATCH] asm not using extended syntax should always be volatile

---
 gcc/cp/parser.cc | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/gcc/cp/parser.cc b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
index a6341b9..2d5d494 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/parser.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/parser.cc
@@ -22355,7 +22355,7 @@ cp_parser_asm_definition (cp_parser* parser)
       /* Create the ASM_EXPR.  */
       if (parser->in_function_body)
  {
-   asm_stmt = finish_asm_stmt (asm_loc, volatile_p, string, outputs,
+   asm_stmt = finish_asm_stmt (asm_loc, !extended_p || volatile_p, string,
outputs,
        inputs, clobbers, labels, inline_p);
    /* If the extended syntax was not used, mark the ASM_EXPR.  */
    if (!extended_p)
-- 
2.35.1.windows.2