> 
> On 6/27/23 12:24, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > On 6/27/23 09:19, Jan Hubicka wrote:
> > > > Hi,
> > > > as shown in the testcase (which would eventually be useful for
> > > > optimizing std::vector's push_back), ipa-prop can use context dependent 
> > > > ranger
> > > > queries for better value range info.
> > > > 
> > > > Bootstrapped/regtested x86_64-linux, OK?
> > > Quick question.
> > > 
> > > When you call enable_ranger(), its gives you a ranger back, but it also 
> > > sets
> > > the range query for the specified context to that same instance.  So from
> > > that point forward  all existing calls to get_range_query(fun) will now 
> > > use
> > > the context ranger
> > > 
> > > enable_ranger (struct function *fun, bool use_imm_uses)
> > > <...>
> > >    gcc_checking_assert (!fun->x_range_query);
> > >    r = new gimple_ranger (use_imm_uses);
> > >    fun->x_range_query = r;
> > >    return r;
> > > 
> > > So you probably dont have to pass a ranger around?  or is that ranger you
> > > are passing for a different context?
> > I don't need passing ranger around - I just did not know that.  I tought
> > the default one is the context insensitive one, I will simplify the
> > patch.  I need to look more into how ranger works.
> > 
> > 
> No need. Its magic!
Cool, thanks for the explanation!
I pushed the following simplified version of the patch.  Now back to
getting push_back faster :)

gcc/ChangeLog:

        PR tree-optimization/110377
        * ipa-prop.cc (ipa_compute_jump_functions_for_edge): Pass statement to
        the ranger query.
        (ipa_analyze_node): Enable ranger.

gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:

        PR tree-optimization/110377
        * gcc.dg/ipa/pr110377.c: New test.

diff --git a/gcc/ipa-prop.cc b/gcc/ipa-prop.cc
index 41c812194ca..33bda8288fc 100644
--- a/gcc/ipa-prop.cc
+++ b/gcc/ipa-prop.cc
@@ -2386,7 +2386,7 @@ ipa_compute_jump_functions_for_edge (struct 
ipa_func_body_info *fbi,
 
          if (TREE_CODE (arg) == SSA_NAME
              && param_type
-             && get_range_query (cfun)->range_of_expr (vr, arg)
+             && get_range_query (cfun)->range_of_expr (vr, arg, cs->call_stmt)
              && vr.nonzero_p ())
            addr_nonzero = true;
          else if (tree_single_nonzero_warnv_p (arg, &strict_overflow))
@@ -2408,7 +2408,7 @@ ipa_compute_jump_functions_for_edge (struct 
ipa_func_body_info *fbi,
              && Value_Range::supports_type_p (param_type)
              && irange::supports_p (TREE_TYPE (arg))
              && irange::supports_p (param_type)
-             && get_range_query (cfun)->range_of_expr (vr, arg)
+             && get_range_query (cfun)->range_of_expr (vr, arg, cs->call_stmt)
              && !vr.undefined_p ())
            {
              Value_Range resvr (vr);
@@ -3190,7 +3190,9 @@ ipa_analyze_node (struct cgraph_node *node)
       bi->cg_edges.safe_push (cs);
     }
 
+  enable_ranger (cfun, false);
   analysis_dom_walker (&fbi).walk (ENTRY_BLOCK_PTR_FOR_FN (cfun));
+  disable_ranger (cfun);
 
   ipa_release_body_info (&fbi);
   free_dominance_info (CDI_DOMINATORS);
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr110377.c 
b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr110377.c
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..63120a97bd0
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/ipa/pr110377.c
@@ -0,0 +1,16 @@
+/* { dg-do compile */
+/* { dg-options "-O2 -fdump-ipa-cp" } */
+int test3(int);
+__attribute__ ((noinline))
+void test2(int a)
+{
+       test3(a);
+}
+void
+test(int n)
+{
+        if (n > 5)
+          __builtin_unreachable ();
+        test2(n);
+}
+/* { dg-final { scan-ipa-dump "-INF, 5" "cp" } }  */

Reply via email to