> Can you push the element_mode change separately please? OK.
> I'd like to hear more reasoning of why target_supports_op_p is wanted > here. Doesn't target_supports_op_p return false if this is for example > a soft-fp target? So if at all, shouldn't the test only be carried > out if the original operation was supported by the target? Tamar and I discussed whether a target check is appropriate yesterday already here and were torn. How or where would we expect a non-supported operation to be discarded, though? In my case the expression is generated during a ranger fold and survives until expand where we ICE. Regards Robin
