On 23/06/23 7:44 am, Peter Bergner wrote: > On 6/1/23 11:54 PM, Ajit Agarwal via Gcc-patches wrote: >> >> >> On 01/06/23 2:06 pm, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: >>> On 1 June 2023 09:20:08 CEST, Ajit Agarwal <aagar...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: >>>> Hello All: >>>> >>>> This patch improves code sinking pass to sink statements before call to >>>> reduce >>>> register pressure. >>>> Review comments are incorporated. >>> >>> Hi Ajit! >>> >>> I had two comments for v4 that you did not address in v5 or followed up. >>> thanks, >> >> Which comments I didn't address. Please let me know. > > I believe he's referring to these two comments: > > > + && dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, new_best_bb, early_bb)) > > + { > > + if (def_use_same_block (use)) > > + return best_bb; > > + > > + return new_best_bb; > > + } > > + return best_bb; > > + } > > > > Many returns. > I'd have said > && !def_use_same_block (use) > return new_best_bb; > else > return best_bb; > > and rephrase the comment above list of Things to consider accordingly. > > > I agree with Bernhard's comment that it could be rewritten to be clearer. > Although, the "else" isn't really required. So Bernhard's version would > look like: > > if (new_best_bb > && use > && new_best_bb != best_bb > && new_best_bb != early_bb > && !is_gimple_call (stmt) > && gsi_end_p (gsi_start_phis (new_best_bb)) > && gimple_bb (use) != early_bb > && !is_gimple_call (use) > && dominated_by_p (CDI_POST_DOMINATORS, new_best_bb, gimple_bb (use)) > && dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, new_best_bb, early_bb) > && !def_use_same_block (use)) > return new_best_bb; > else > return best_bb; > > ...or just: > > if (new_best_bb > && use > && new_best_bb != best_bb > && new_best_bb != early_bb > && !is_gimple_call (stmt) > && gsi_end_p (gsi_start_phis (new_best_bb)) > && gimple_bb (use) != early_bb > && !is_gimple_call (use) > && dominated_by_p (CDI_POST_DOMINATORS, new_best_bb, gimple_bb (use)) > && dominated_by_p (CDI_DOMINATORS, new_best_bb, early_bb) > && !def_use_same_block (use)) > return new_best_bb; > > return best_bb; > > > Either works. Thanks Peter. I will incorporate and send the new version of the patch. > > > Peter >
Re: [PATCH v5] tree-ssa-sink: Improve code sinking pass
Ajit Agarwal via Gcc-patches Fri, 23 Jun 2023 00:49:55 -0700
- [PATCH v5] tree-ssa-sink: Improve... Ajit Agarwal via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH v5] tree-ssa-sink... Bernhard Reutner-Fischer via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH v5] tree-ssa-... Ajit Agarwal via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH v5] tree-... Peter Bergner via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH v5] t... Ajit Agarwal via Gcc-patches