Hi All,

It seems like @blackslashchar{} is a relatively new addition
to texinfo.  Other parts of the docs use @samp{\} so use it
here too so older distros work.

Bootstrapped on aarch64-none-linux-gnu and no issues.

committed under obvious rule.

Thanks,
Tamar

gcc/ChangeLog:

        PR other/110329
        * doc/md.texi: Replace backslashchar.

--- inline copy of patch -- 
diff --git a/gcc/doc/md.texi b/gcc/doc/md.texi
index 
052375b1a31b829303e75417c400024f084aef44..9648fdc846abf1700effe3272d5523538ce9b50f
 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/md.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/md.texi
@@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ blocks on the line.
 @item
 Within an @samp{@{@@} block, any iterators that do not get expanded will result
 in an error.  If for some reason it is required to have @code{<} or @code{>} in
-the output then these must be escaped using @backslashchar{}.
+the output then these must be escaped using @samp{\}.
 
 @item
 It is possible to use the @samp{attrs} list to specify some attributes and to




-- 
diff --git a/gcc/doc/md.texi b/gcc/doc/md.texi
index 
052375b1a31b829303e75417c400024f084aef44..9648fdc846abf1700effe3272d5523538ce9b50f
 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/md.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/md.texi
@@ -837,7 +837,7 @@ blocks on the line.
 @item
 Within an @samp{@{@@} block, any iterators that do not get expanded will result
 in an error.  If for some reason it is required to have @code{<} or @code{>} in
-the output then these must be escaped using @backslashchar{}.
+the output then these must be escaped using @samp{\}.
 
 @item
 It is possible to use the @samp{attrs} list to specify some attributes and to



Reply via email to