On 6/16/23 06:02, Thiago Jung Bauermann via Gcc-patches wrote:
When parsing a summary or manifest file, if we're not either after a tool
line (e.g. "=== gdb tests ===") or before a summary line (e.g.,
"=== gdb Summary ===") then the current line can't be a valid result line
so ignore it.

This addresses a problem we're seeing when running the GDB testsuite in
our CI environment where it produces a valid summary file, but then after
the "=== gdb Summary ===" section it outputs a series of Tcl errors that
match _VALID_TEST_RESULTS_REX and thus confuse the parsing logic:

05: 14:32 .sum file seems to be broken: tool="None", exp="None", 
summary_line="ERROR: -------------------------------------------"
05: 14:32 Traceback (most recent call last):
05: 14:32   File "/path/to/gcc/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py", 
line 706, in <module>
05: 14:32     retval = Main(sys.argv)
05: 14:32   File 
"/path/to/gcc/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py", line 697, in 
Main
05: 14:32     retval = CheckExpectedResults()
05: 14:32   File 
"/path/to/gcc/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py", line 572, in 
CheckExpectedResults
05: 14:32     actual = GetResults(sum_files)
05: 14:32   File 
"/path/to/gcc/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py", line 447, in 
GetResults
05: 14:32     build_results.update(ParseSummary(sum_fname))
05: 14:32   File 
"/path/to/gcc/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py", line 389, in 
ParseSummary
05: 14:32     result = result_set.MakeTestResult(line, ordinal)
05: 14:32   File 
"/path/to/gcc/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py", line 236, in 
MakeTestResult
05: 14:32     return TestResult(summary_line, ordinal,
05: 14:32   File 
"/path/to/gcc/contrib/testsuite-management/validate_failures.py", line 148, in 
__init__
05: 14:32     raise

contrib/ChangeLog:

        * testsuite-management/validate_failures.py (IsInterestingResult):
        Add result_set argument and use it.  Adjust callers.
Thanks.  I pushed this to the trunk.
jeff

Reply via email to