On 2023-06-13 03:26 Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>On 6/6/23 23:52, Fei Gao wrote:
>> Disable zcmp multi push/pop if shrink-wrap-separate is active.
>>
>> So in -Os that prefers smaller code size, by default shrink-wrap-separate
>> is disabled while zcmp multi push/pop is enabled.
>>
>> And in -O2 and others that prefers speed, by default shrink-wrap-separate
>> is enabled while zcmp multi push/pop is disabled. To force enabling zcmp
>> multi
>> push/pop in this case, -fno-shrink-wrap-separate has to be explictly given.
>>
>> The following TC shows the issues in -O2 before this patch with both
>> shrink-wrap-separate and zcmp multi push/pop active.
>> 1. duplicated store of s regs.
>> 2. cm.push pushes ra, s0-s11 in reverse order than what normal
>> prologue does, causing stack corruption and failure to resotre s regs.
>>
>> TC: zcmp_shrink_wrap_separate.c included in this patch.
>>
>> output asm before this patch:
>> calc_func:
>> cm.push {ra, s0-s3}, -32
>> ...
>> beq a5,zero,.L2
>> ...
>> .L2:
>> ...
>> sw s1,20(sp) //issue here
>> sw s3,12(sp) //issue here
>> ...
>> sw s2,16(sp) //issue here
>>
>> output asm after this patch:
>> calc_func:
>> addi sp,sp,-32
>> sw s0,24(sp)
>> ...
>> beq a5,zero,.L2
>> ...
>> .L2:
>> ...
>> sw s1,20(sp)
>> sw s3,12(sp)
>> ...
>> sw s2,16(sp)
>> gcc/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * config/riscv/riscv.cc
>> (riscv_avoid_shrink_wrapping_separate): wrap the condition check in
>> riscv_avoid_shrink_wrapping_separate.
>> (riscv_avoid_multi_push): avoid multi push if
>>shrink_wrapping_separate
>> is active.
>> (riscv_get_separate_components): call
>>riscv_avoid_shrink_wrapping_separate
>> * shrink-wrap.cc (try_shrink_wrapping_separate): call
>> use_shrink_wrapping_separate.
>> (use_shrink_wrapping_separate):wrap the condition
>> check in use_shrink_wrapping_separate
>> * shrink-wrap.h (use_shrink_wrapping_separate): add to extern
>>
>> gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
>>
>> * gcc.target/riscv/zcmp_shrink_wrap_separate.c: New test.
>> * gcc.target/riscv/zcmp_shrink_wrap_separate2.c: New test.
>I know Kito asked for this to be broken up into target dependent vs
>target independent changes, that's a good ask.
>
>Can't we utilize the get_separate_components hook to accomplish what
>you're trying to do? ie, put the logic to avoid shrink wrapping for
>this case within the existing risc-v hook?
Thank Jeff and Kito for your comments.
My first try was to avoid shrink wrapping if zcmp is enabled.
But after discussion with Kito and Andrew Pinski, I realized it's better to
disable
zcmp push and pops if shrink wrapping is active.
For detailed discussion, please check link below.
thread: [PATCH 1/2] [RISC-V] disable shrink-wrap-separate if zcmp enabled.
link: https://www.mail-archive.com/gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org/msg307203.html
I will go ahead with Kito's advice if you're fine with the current solution.
Thanks.
BR,
Fei
>
>jeff
