> > I'd very much like to see the condops go into GCC as well, but I've been > > hesitant to move it forward myself. We're still waiting on hardware and > > it wasn't clear to me that we really had consensus agreement to move the > > bits forward based on an announcement vs waiting on actual hardware > > availability (based on the comments from Palmer when I upstreamed the > > binutils bits).
My bad, apparently I grep wrong binutils so I thought it isn't in the tree yet, I don't have strong opinion on that, so I would defer this to Palmer.
