> On May 25, 2023, at 4:51 PM, Joseph Myers <jos...@codesourcery.com> wrote: > > The documentation in this case is OK, though claims about how a future > version will behave have a poor track record (we tend to end up with such > claims persisting in the documentation even though the change in question > didn't get made and might sometimes no longer be considered desirable). Then, do you have any suggestions on this claim? Shall we delete it from the doc? Or keep it? Qing > > -- > Joseph S. Myers > jos...@codesourcery.com
- [V8][PATCH 0/2]Accept and Handle the case when a... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
- [PATCH 1/2] Handle component_ref to a struc... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
- [PATCH 2/2] Update documentation to clarify... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
- [V8][PATCH 0/2]Accept and Handle the case w... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
- [V8][PATCH 1/2] Handle component_ref to... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
- [V8][PATCH 2/2] Update documentation to... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
- Re: [V8][PATCH 2/2] Update document... Joseph Myers
- Re: [V8][PATCH 2/2] Update docu... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
- Re: [V8][PATCH 2/2] Update... Joseph Myers
- Re: [V8][PATCH 2/2] Up... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches
- Re: [V8][PATCH 2/2... Joseph Myers
- Re: [V8][PATCH 2/2... Qing Zhao via Gcc-patches