From: Eric Botcazou <ebotca...@adacore.com>
This makes it so that the compiler does not crash and flags the underlying
violation of the restriction instead.
gcc/ada/
* exp_ch3.adb (Freeze_Type): Do not associate the Finalize_Address
routine for a class-wide type if restriction No_Dispatching_Calls
is in effect.
Tested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, committed on master.
---
gcc/ada/exp_ch3.adb | 6 +++++-
1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/ada/exp_ch3.adb b/gcc/ada/exp_ch3.adb
index 363186565f6..33e96a0ff90 100644
--- a/gcc/ada/exp_ch3.adb
+++ b/gcc/ada/exp_ch3.adb
@@ -9251,9 +9251,13 @@ package body Exp_Ch3 is
-- this is indeed the case, associate the Finalize_Address routine
-- of the full view with the finalization masters of all pending
-- access types. This scenario applies to anonymous access types as
- -- well.
+ -- well. But the Finalize_Address routine is missing if the type is
+ -- class-wide and we are under restriction No_Dispatching_Calls, see
+ -- Expand_Freeze_Class_Wide_Type above for the rationale.
elsif Needs_Finalization (Typ)
+ and then (not Is_Class_Wide_Type (Typ)
+ or else not Restriction_Active (No_Dispatching_Calls))
and then Present (Pending_Access_Types (Typ))
then
E := First_Elmt (Pending_Access_Types (Typ));
--
2.40.0
