On Wed, May 17, 2023 at 11:36 AM juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai <juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai> wrote: > > >> Does it means we assume inner_int_mode is DImode? (because sizeof > >> (uint64_t)) > >> or it should be something like `for (unsigned int i = 0; i < > >> (GET_MODE_SIZE(inner_int_mode ()) * 8 / npatterns ()); i++)` ? > No, sizeof (uint64_t) means uint64_t mask = 0;
+ return gen_int_mode (mask, inner_int_mode ()); And we expect the uint64_t mask can always be put into inner_int_mode ()? If not, why do we fill up all 64 bits? > > >> Do you mind give more comment about this? what it checked and what it did? > The reason we use known_gt (GET_MODE_SIZE (dup_mode), BYTES_PER_RISCV_VECTOR) > since we want are using vector integer mode to generate the mask for example > we generate 0b01010101010101.... mask, we should use a scalar register > holding value = 0b010101010... > Then vmv.v.x into a vector,then this vector will be used as a mask. > > >> Why this only hide in else? I guess I have this question is because I > >> don't fully understand the logic of the if condition? > > Since we can't vector floting-point instruction to generate a mask. I don't get why it's not something like below? if (known_gt (GET_MODE_SIZE (dup_mode), BYTES_PER_RISCV_VECTOR)) { ... } if (FLOAT_MODE_P (dup_mode)) { ... } > > >> nit: builder.inner_mode () rather than GET_MODE_INNER (dup_mode)? > > They are the same. I can change it using GET_MODE_INNER > > >> And I would like have more commnet to explain why we need force_reg here. > Since it will creat ICE. But why? And why can it be resolved by force_reg? you need few more comment in the code