On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:39 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 7:06 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsri...@google.com> wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:24 PM, H.J. Lu <hjl.to...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>> On Tue, Apr 24, 2012 at 5:10 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsri...@google.com> 
>>> wrote:
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>>   Thanks for all the comments. I have made all the changes as
>>>> mentioned and submiited the patch. Summary of changes made:
>>>>
>>>> * Add support for AVX
>>>> * Fix documentation in extend.texi
>>>> * Make it thread-safe according to H.J.'s comments.
>>>>
>>>> I have attached the patch. Boot-strapped and checked for test parity
>>>> with pristine build.
>>>>
>>>>       * config/i386/i386.c (build_processor_model_struct): New function.
>>>>        (make_var_decl): New function.
>>>>        (fold_builtin_cpu): New function.
>>>>        (ix86_fold_builtin): New function.
>>>>        (make_cpu_type_builtin): New function.
>>>>        (ix86_init_platform_type_builtins): New function.
>>>>        (ix86_expand_builtin): Expand new builtins by folding them.
>>>>        (ix86_init_builtins): Make new builtins to detect CPU type.
>>>>        (TARGET_FOLD_BUILTIN): New macro.
>>>>        (IX86_BUILTIN_CPU_INIT): New enum value.
>>>>        (IX86_BUILTIN_CPU_IS): New enum value.
>>>>        (IX86_BUILTIN_CPU_SUPPORTS): New enum value.
>>>>        * config/i386/i386-builtin-types.def: New function type.
>>>>        * testsuite/gcc.target/builtin_target.c: New testcase.
>>>>        * doc/extend.texi: Document builtins.
>>>>
>>>>        * libgcc/config/i386/i386-cpuinfo.c: New file.
>>>>        * libgcc/config/i386/t-cpuinfo: New file.
>>>>        * libgcc/config.host: Include t-cpuinfo.
>>>>        * libgcc/config/i386/libgcc-glibc.ver: Version symbol __cpu_model.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> +  /* This function needs to run just once.  */
>>> +  if (__cpu_model.__cpu_vendor)
>>> +    return 0;
>>> +
>>> +  /* Assume cpuid insn present. Run in level 0 to get vendor id. */
>>> +  if (!__get_cpuid_output (0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx))
>>> +    return -1;
>>>
>>> If __get_cpuid_output returns non-zero, it will be called
>>> repeatedly.  I think you should set __cpu_model.__cpu_vendor
>>> to non-zero in this case.
>>
>> Done now.
>>
>> 2012-04-24  Sriraman Tallam  <tmsri...@google.com>
>>
>>        * libgcc/config/i386/i386-cpuinfo.c: Set __cpu_vendor always.
>>
>>
>> Index: libgcc/config/i386/i386-cpuinfo.c
>> ===================================================================
>> --- libgcc/config/i386/i386-cpuinfo.c   (revision 186789)
>> +++ libgcc/config/i386/i386-cpuinfo.c   (working copy)
>> @@ -256,16 +256,25 @@ __cpu_indicator_init (void)
>>
>>   /* Assume cpuid insn present. Run in level 0 to get vendor id. */
>>   if (!__get_cpuid_output (0, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx))
>> -    return -1;
>> +    {
>> +      __cpu_model.__cpu_vendor = VENDOR_OTHER;
>> +      return -1;
>> +    }
>>
>>   vendor = ebx;
>>   max_level = eax;
>>
>>   if (max_level < 1)
>> -    return -1;
>> +    {
>> +      __cpu_model.__cpu_vendor = VENDOR_OTHER;
>> +      return -1;
>> +    }
>>
>>   if (!__get_cpuid_output (1, &eax, &ebx, &ecx, &edx))
>> -    return -1;
>> +    {
>> +      __cpu_model.__cpu_vendor = VENDOR_OTHER;
>> +      return -1;
>> +    }
>>
>>   model = (eax >> 4) & 0x0f;
>>   family = (eax >> 8) & 0x0f;
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>
> Should you also handle AVX2?

 I cannot test it and thought will wait till I get access to a
processor with AVX2.

Thanks,
-Sri.


>
>
> --
> H.J.

Reply via email to