On 5/5/23 09:08, Tamar Christina wrote:
-----Original Message-----
From: Jeff Law <jeffreya...@gmail.com>
Sent: Friday, May 5, 2023 4:04 PM
To: David Edelsohn <dje....@gmail.com>; Tamar Christina
<tamar.christ...@arm.com>
Cc: GCC Patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 5/5] match.pd: Use splits in makefile and make
configurable.
On 5/5/23 08:59, David Edelsohn via Gcc-patches wrote:
This patch has broken GCC bootstrap on AIX. It appears to rely upon,
or complain about, the command "seq":
/nasfarm/edelsohn/install/GCC12/bin/g++ -std=c++11 -g -DIN_GCC
-fno-exceptions -fno-rtti -fasynchronous-unwind-tables -W -Wall
-Wno-narrowing -Wwrite-strings -Wcast-qual -Wno-format
-Wmissing-format-attribute -Wconditionally-supported
-Woverloaded-virtual -pedantic -Wno-long-long -Wno-variadic-macros
-Wno-overlength-strings -fno-common -DHAVE_CONFIG_H -
DGENERATOR_FILE
-static-libstdc++ -static-libgcc -Wl,-bbigtoc -Wl,-bmaxdata:0x40000000 -o
build/genmatch \
build/genmatch.o ../build-powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0/libcpp/libcpp.a
build/errors.o build/vec.o build/hash-table.o build/sort.o
../build-powerpc-ibm-aix7.2.5.0/libiberty/libiberty.a
/usr/bin/bash: seq: command not found
/usr/bin/bash: seq: command not found
build/genmatch --gimple \
--header=tmp-gimple-match-auto.h --include=gimple-match-auto.h \
/nasfarm/edelsohn/src/src/gcc/match.pd
All of the match files are dumped to stdout.
Sigh. So the question is do we make seq a requirement or do we implement an
alternate to get the sequence or implement a fallback.
jeff
I'm looking for an alternate sequence now.
If I don't find one in a bit, since Monday is a bank holiday for the UK I can
temporarily
Ignore the configure flag by defining
MATCH_SPLITS_SEQ = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Would that be ok as a temporary fix if I don't find anything else by EOD? But
hoping to find another way that doesn't rely on coreutils.
Yea, that would be a fine workaround while we sort this out.
jeff
