On 5/2/23 14:34, Patrick O'Neill wrote:
Let me sync with Richi & Jakub. They're the release managers and this doesn't fall under the usual rules for things that can be backported.Is this OK for a backport to GCC-13 as well?
jeff
- Re: [PATCH v5] RISCV: Inline subword atomic... Andreas Schwab
- [PATCH v6] RISCV: Inline subword atomic ops Patrick O'Neill
- Re: [PATCH v6] RISCV: Inline subword a... Palmer Dabbelt
- [PATCH v7] RISCV: Inline subword atomi... Patrick O'Neill
- Re: [PATCH v7] RISCV: Inline subwo... Patrick O'Neill
- Re: [PATCH v7] RISCV: Inline subwo... Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH v7] RISCV: Inline s... Patrick O'Neill
- Re: [PATCH v7] RISCV: Inli... Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
- [committed] RISCV: In... Patrick O'Neill
- Re: [committed] R... Patrick O'Neill
- Re: [committed] R... Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
- Re: [committed] R... Richard Biener via Gcc-patches
- Re: [committed] R... Palmer Dabbelt
- Re: [committed] R... Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
- Re: [committed] R... Palmer Dabbelt
- Re: [committed] R... Patrick O'Neill
- Re: [PATCH v5] RISCV: Inline subword atomic... Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH v5] RISCV: Inline subword a... Patrick O'Neill
- Re: [PATCH v5] RISCV: Inline subwo... Jeff Law via Gcc-patches
