On Sat, 29 Apr 2023 10:52:50 PDT (-0700), jeffreya...@gmail.com wrote:


On 4/29/23 11:48, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:

Yea.  And taking advantage of that behavior is definitely a performance
issue for QEMU.  There's still work to do though.  QEMU on vector code
is running crazy slow.

I guess we're kind of off the rails for a GCC patch, but that's
definately true.  Across the board RVV is going to just need a lot of
work, it's very different than SVE or AVX.

Unfortunately QEMU performance isn't really a priority on our end, but
it's great to see folks digging into it.
Well, when a user mode SPEC run goes from ~15 minutes to multiple hours
for a single input workload within specint it becomes a development
problem.  Daniel is loosely affiliated with my group in Ventana, so I
can bug him with this kind of stuff.

We've got another team actually doing the mechanics of the SPEC runs, we just do the compiler. So while I guess it is a problem, it's not my problem ;)

Maybe not the best way to go about things, but there's only so much that can be done...

Reply via email to