> Am 22.04.2023 um 10:23 schrieb Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>: > > Hi! > > As reported, pr109011-{4,5}.c tests fail on powerpc. > I thought they should have the same counts as the corresponding -{2,3}.c > tests, the only difference is that -{2,3}.c are int while -{4,5}.c are > long long. But there are 2 issues. One is that in the foo > function the vectorization costs comparison triggered in, while in -{2,3}.c > we use vectorization factor 4 and it was found beneficial, when using > long long it was just vf 2 and the scalar cost of doing > p[i] = __builtin_ctzll (q[i]) twice looked smaller than the vectorizated > statements. I could disable the cost model, but instead chose to add > some further arithmetics to those functions to make it beneficial even > with vf 2. > After that change, pr109011-4.c still failed; I was expecting 4 .CTZ calls > there on power9, 3 vectorized and one in scalar code, but for some reason > the scalar one didn't trigger. As I really want to count just the > vectorized calls, I've added the vect prefix on the variables to ensure > I'm only counting vectorized calls and decreased the 4 counts to 3. > > With this, the tests pass on x86_64-linux, i686-linux, powerpc64le-linux > and powerpc64-linux (the last one -m32/-m64). Ok for trunk? Ok > 2023-04-22 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com> > > PR testsuite/109572 > * gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-1.c: In scan-tree-dump-times regexps match also > vect prefix to make sure we only count vectorized calls. > * gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-2.c: Likewise. On powerpc* expect just count 3 > rather than 4. > * gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-3.c: In scan-tree-dump-times regexps match also > vect prefix to make sure we only count vectorized calls. > * gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-4.c: Likewise. On powerpc* expect just count 3 > rather than 4. > (foo): Add 2 further arithmetic ops to the loop to make it appear > worthwhile for vectorization heuristics on powerpc. > * gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-5.c: In scan-tree-dump-times regexps match also > vect prefix to make sure we only count vectorized calls. > (foo): Add 2 further arithmetic ops to the loop to make it appear > worthwhile for vectorization heuristics on powerpc. > > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-1.c.jj 2023-04-20 > 16:30:21.684160677 +0200 > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-1.c 2023-04-22 10:03:28.403367294 > +0200 > @@ -14,8 +14,8 @@ foo (long long *p, long long *q) > p[i] = __builtin_popcountll (q[i]); > } > > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.POPCOUNT \\\(" 1 "optimized" { > target { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && avx512vpopcntdq } } } } */ > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.POPCOUNT \\\(" 1 "optimized" { > target { powerpc_p8vector_ok || s390_vx } } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.POPCOUNT \\\(vect" 1 "optimized" > { target { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && avx512vpopcntdq } } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.POPCOUNT \\\(vect" 1 "optimized" > { target { powerpc_p8vector_ok || s390_vx } } } } */ > > void > bar (long long *p, long long *q) > @@ -25,5 +25,5 @@ bar (long long *p, long long *q) > p[i] = __builtin_clzll (q[i]); > } > > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CLZ \\\(" 1 "optimized" { target > { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && avx512cd } } } } */ > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CLZ \\\(" 1 "optimized" { target > { powerpc_p8vector_ok || s390_vx } } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CLZ \\\(vect" 1 "optimized" { > target { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && avx512cd } } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CLZ \\\(vect" 1 "optimized" { > target { powerpc_p8vector_ok || s390_vx } } } } */ > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-2.c.jj 2023-04-20 > 16:30:21.684160677 +0200 > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-2.c 2023-04-22 10:03:47.194092051 > +0200 > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ baz (int *p, int *q) > p[i] = __builtin_ffs (q[i]); > } > > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CLZ \\\(" 3 "optimized" { target > { { { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && avx512cd } && lzcnt } && bmi } } } } */ > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CTZ \\\(" 4 "optimized" { target > powerpc_p9vector_ok } } } */ > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CTZ \\\(" 2 "optimized" { target > s390_vx } } } */ > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.POPCOUNT \\\(" 1 "optimized" { > target s390_vx } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CLZ \\\(vect" 3 "optimized" { > target { { { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && avx512cd } && lzcnt } && bmi } } } } > */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CTZ \\\(vect" 3 "optimized" { > target powerpc_p9vector_ok } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CTZ \\\(vect" 2 "optimized" { > target s390_vx } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.POPCOUNT \\\(vect" 1 "optimized" > { target s390_vx } } } */ > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-3.c.jj 2023-04-20 > 16:30:21.684160677 +0200 > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-3.c 2023-04-22 10:04:00.481897412 > +0200 > @@ -28,5 +28,5 @@ baz (int *p, int *q) > p[i] = __builtin_ffs (q[i]); > } > > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.POPCOUNT \\\(" 3 "optimized" { > target { { { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && avx512vpopcntdq } && lzcnt } && bmi } > } } } */ > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CLZ \\\(" 3 "optimized" { target > powerpc_p8vector_ok } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.POPCOUNT \\\(vect" 3 "optimized" > { target { { { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && avx512vpopcntdq } && lzcnt } && bmi > } } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CLZ \\\(vect" 3 "optimized" { > target powerpc_p8vector_ok } } } */ > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-4.c.jj 2023-04-20 > 16:30:21.684160677 +0200 > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-4.c 2023-04-22 10:04:15.694674578 > +0200 > @@ -10,7 +10,7 @@ foo (long long *p, long long *q) > { > #pragma omp simd > for (int i = 0; i < 2048; ++i) > - p[i] = __builtin_ctzll (q[i]); > + p[i] = 2 * q[i] + __builtin_ctzll (q[i]); > } > > void > @@ -29,7 +29,7 @@ baz (long long *p, long long *q) > p[i] = __builtin_ffsll (q[i]); > } > > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CLZ \\\(" 3 "optimized" { target > { { { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && avx512cd } && lzcnt } && bmi } } } } */ > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CTZ \\\(" 4 "optimized" { target > powerpc_p9vector_ok } } } */ > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CTZ \\\(" 2 "optimized" { target > s390_vx } } } */ > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.POPCOUNT \\\(" 1 "optimized" { > target s390_vx } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CLZ \\\(vect" 3 "optimized" { > target { { { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && avx512cd } && lzcnt } && bmi } } } } > */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CTZ \\\(vect" 3 "optimized" { > target powerpc_p9vector_ok } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CTZ \\\(vect" 2 "optimized" { > target s390_vx } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.POPCOUNT \\\(vect" 1 "optimized" > { target s390_vx } } } */ > --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-5.c.jj 2023-04-20 > 16:30:21.684160677 +0200 > +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/pr109011-5.c 2023-04-22 10:04:28.351489185 > +0200 > @@ -9,7 +9,7 @@ foo (long long *p, long long *q) > { > #pragma omp simd > for (int i = 0; i < 2048; ++i) > - p[i] = __builtin_ctzll (q[i]); > + p[i] = 2 * q[i] + __builtin_ctzll (q[i]); > } > > void > @@ -28,5 +28,5 @@ baz (long long *p, long long *q) > p[i] = __builtin_ffsll (q[i]); > } > > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.POPCOUNT \\\(" 3 "optimized" { > target { { { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && avx512vpopcntdq } && lzcnt } && bmi } > } } } */ > -/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CLZ \\\(" 3 "optimized" { target > powerpc_p8vector_ok } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.POPCOUNT \\\(vect" 3 "optimized" > { target { { { { i?86-*-* x86_64-*-* } && avx512vpopcntdq } && lzcnt } && bmi > } } } } */ > +/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times " = \.CLZ \\\(vect" 3 "optimized" { > target powerpc_p8vector_ok } } } */ > > Jakub >
Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Fix up pr109011-*.c tests for powerpc [PR109572]
Richard Biener via Gcc-patches Sat, 22 Apr 2023 10:38:39 -0700
- [PATCH] testsuite: Fix up pr109011-*.c test... Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches
- Re: [PATCH] testsuite: Fix up pr109011... Richard Biener via Gcc-patches