On Mon, Apr 23, 2012 at 1:19 AM, Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> wrote: > On Tue, Apr 3, 2012 at 9:47 PM, Sriraman Tallam <tmsri...@google.com> wrote: > >> i386 maintainers - Is this patch ok? > > Has the community reached the consensus on how this kind of > functionality has to be implemented? I have followed the discussion a > bit, but IIRC, there was no clear decision. Without this decision, I > am not able to review the _implementation_ of agreed functionality for > x86 target. > > (I apologize if I have missed the decision, please point me to the > discussion in this case.)
Also, Richard's ok on just using 2 builtins: __builtin_cpu_is and __builtin_cpu_supports http://gcc.gnu.org/ml/gcc-patches/2012-03/msg00752.html > >>>>> Patch available for review here: >>>>> http://codereview.appspot.com/5754058 > > Please attach patches or inline it in the message itself for a review. > Please see [1] for further instructions. > > [1] http://gcc.gnu.org/contribute.html#patches > > Uros.
