On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 9:41 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez <lopeziba...@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Gabriel, > > I hope you meant to send this OK also to gcc-patches.
Indeed. > > Cheers, > > Manuel. > > On 21 April 2012 16:25, Gabriel Dos Reis <g...@integrable-solutions.net> > wrote: >> OK. >> >> On Sat, Apr 21, 2012 at 9:06 AM, Manuel López-Ibáñez >> <lopeziba...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> This patch avoids pretty-printing expressions when the caret is >>> enabled for the error given when calling as a function something that >>> is not a function. >>> >>> This fixes (when caret is enabled) the bugs described in PR35441 and >>> also shown here http://clang.llvm.org/diagnostics.html (No Pretty >>> Printing of Expressions in Diagnostics). >>> >>> Bootstrapped/regression tested. >>> >>> OK? >>> >>> 2012-04-21 Manuel López-Ibáñez <m...@gcc.gnu.org> >>> >>> PR 35441 >>> * c-typeck.c (inform_declaration): New. >>> (build_function_call_vec): Do not pretty-print >>> expressions when caret is enabled. >>> (convert_arguments): Use inform_declaration. >>> * cp/typeck.c (cp_build_function_call_vec): Do not pretty-print >>> expressions when caret is enabled. >>> * testsuite/c-c++-common/pr35441.C: New.
