Am Do., 30. März 2023 um 18:00 Uhr schrieb Jonathan Wakely via Libstdc++ <libstd...@gcc.gnu.org>: > [..] > > In fact, thinking about P2641 some more, I might revert this change. > Instead of adding an extra bool member to support constexpr, I think > I'll just remove the 'constexpr' keywords from basic_endpoint for now, > and implement it in terms of just inspecting the sa_family_t member of > the union members. And then later, once we have something like P2641, > we can re-add the constexpr keywords and use is_within_lifetime during > constant evaluation. That way we don't add a bool then need to take it > away again, changing the ABI each time.
I was just going to make the same suggestion. - Daniel
