Hi!

The following testcase ICEs since r11-2259 because assign_386_stack_local
-> assign_stack_local -> ix86_local_alignment now uses 64-bit alignment
for DImode temporaries rather than 32-bit as before.
Most of the spots in the backend which ask for DImode temporaries are during
expansion and those apparently are handled fine with -m32
-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2, we dynamically realign the stack in that case
(most of the spots actually don't need that alignment but at least one
does), then 2 spots are in STV which I assume also work correctly.
But during splitting we can create a DImode slot which doesn't need to be
64-bit alignment (it is nicer for performance though), when we apparently
aren't able to detect it for dynamic stack realignment purposes.

The following patch just makes the slot 32-bit aligned in that rare case.

Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?

2023-03-28  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR target/109276
        * config/i386/i386.cc (assign_386_stack_local): For DImode
        with SLOT_FLOATxFDI_387 and -m32 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2 pass
        align 32 rather than 0 to assign_stack_local.

        * gcc.target/i386/pr109276.c: New test.

--- gcc/config/i386/i386.cc.jj  2023-03-23 10:00:58.415099003 +0100
+++ gcc/config/i386/i386.cc     2023-03-27 17:36:37.405390440 +0200
@@ -16682,10 +16682,18 @@ assign_386_stack_local (machine_mode mod
     if (s->mode == mode && s->n == n)
       return validize_mem (copy_rtx (s->rtl));
 
+  int align = 0;
+  /* For DImode with SLOT_FLOATxFDI_387 use 32-bit
+     alignment with -m32 -mpreferred-stack-boundary=2.  */
+  if (mode == DImode
+      && !TARGET_64BIT
+      && n == SLOT_FLOATxFDI_387
+      && ix86_preferred_stack_boundary < GET_MODE_ALIGNMENT (DImode))
+    align = 32;
   s = ggc_alloc<stack_local_entry> ();
   s->n = n;
   s->mode = mode;
-  s->rtl = assign_stack_local (mode, GET_MODE_SIZE (mode), 0);
+  s->rtl = assign_stack_local (mode, GET_MODE_SIZE (mode), align);
 
   s->next = ix86_stack_locals;
   ix86_stack_locals = s;
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr109276.c.jj 2023-03-27 17:43:59.977007379 
+0200
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.target/i386/pr109276.c    2023-03-27 17:44:52.516249622 
+0200
@@ -0,0 +1,13 @@
+/* PR target/109276 */
+/* { dg-do compile } */
+/* { dg-options "-march=x86-64" } */
+/* { dg-additional-options "-mpreferred-stack-boundary=2" { target ia32 } } */
+
+long long a;
+long double b;
+
+void
+foo (void)
+{
+  b += a;
+}

        Jakub

Reply via email to