Jin Ma via Gcc-patches <gcc-patches@gcc.gnu.org> writes:
> Unrecog insns (such as CLOBBER, USE) does not represent real instructions,
> but in the
> process of pipeline optimization, they will wait for transmission in ready
> list like
> other insns, without considering resource conflicts and cycles. This results
> in a
> multi-issue CPU architecture that can be issued at any time if other regular
> insns
> have resource conflicts or cannot be launched for other reasons. As a result,
> its
> position is advanced in the generated insns sequence, which will affect
> register
> allocation and often lead to more redundant mov instructions.
Is it the clobber rather than the use case that is causing problems?
I would expect that scheduling a use ASAP would be better for register
pressure, since it might close off the associated live range and so
reduce the number of conflicts.
I.e. is the problem that, when a live range starts with a clobber,
the current code will tend to move the clobber up and so extend
the associated live range? If so, that sounds like something we
should address more directly, for two reasons:
(1) We should try to prevent clobbers that start a live range from being
moved up even if first_cycle_insn_p.
(2) Clobbers can also be used to close off a live range, which is useful
if a pseudo is only written to in parts. The current behaviour is
probably better for those clobbers.
In general, if you're hitting register pressure problems with scheduling,
have you tried enabling -fsched-pressure by default, possibly with
--param=sched-pressure-algorithm=2 (but try with the default algo too)?
Thanks,
Richard
>
> gcc/ChangeLog:
>
> * haifa-sched.cc (prune_ready_list): Consider unrecog insns(CLOBBER and
> USE)
> in pruning ready lists.
> ---
> gcc/haifa-sched.cc | 8 ++++++++
> 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gcc/haifa-sched.cc b/gcc/haifa-sched.cc
> index 48b53776fa9..72c4c44da76 100644
> --- a/gcc/haifa-sched.cc
> +++ b/gcc/haifa-sched.cc
> @@ -6318,6 +6318,14 @@ prune_ready_list (state_t temp_state, bool
> first_cycle_insn_p,
> cost = 1;
> reason = "not a shadow";
> }
> + else if (recog_memoized (insn) < 0
> + && (GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) == CLOBBER
> + || GET_CODE (PATTERN (insn)) == USE))
> + {
> + if (!first_cycle_insn_p)
> + cost = 1;
> + reason = "unrecog insn";
> + }
> else if (recog_memoized (insn) < 0)
> {
> if (!first_cycle_insn_p
