Hi,

> On 04/19/2012 08:45 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> @@ -812,7 +816,7 @@ build_list_conv (tree type, tree ctor, int flags)
>>      {
>>        conversion *sub
>>      = implicit_conversion (elttype, TREE_TYPE (val), val,
>> -                   false, flags);
>> +                   false, flags, tf_warning_or_error);
> 
> I'm still seeing several new occurrences of tf_warning_or_error in overload 
> resolution code.  :)

Yes, that's life ;) Seriously, if we want to avoid all those having to do with 
implicit_conversion in one swoop, the eventual patch will be pretty big, should 
I just go on and on?

Paolo

Reply via email to