Hi,
> On 04/19/2012 08:45 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote:
>> @@ -812,7 +816,7 @@ build_list_conv (tree type, tree ctor, int flags)
>> {
>> conversion *sub
>> = implicit_conversion (elttype, TREE_TYPE (val), val,
>> - false, flags);
>> + false, flags, tf_warning_or_error);
>
> I'm still seeing several new occurrences of tf_warning_or_error in overload
> resolution code. :)
Yes, that's life ;) Seriously, if we want to avoid all those having to do with
implicit_conversion in one swoop, the eventual patch will be pretty big, should
I just go on and on?
Paolo