Hi, > On 04/19/2012 08:45 AM, Paolo Carlini wrote: >> @@ -812,7 +816,7 @@ build_list_conv (tree type, tree ctor, int flags) >> { >> conversion *sub >> = implicit_conversion (elttype, TREE_TYPE (val), val, >> - false, flags); >> + false, flags, tf_warning_or_error); > > I'm still seeing several new occurrences of tf_warning_or_error in overload > resolution code. :)
Yes, that's life ;) Seriously, if we want to avoid all those having to do with implicit_conversion in one swoop, the eventual patch will be pretty big, should I just go on and on? Paolo