Cupertino Miranda via Gcc-patches writes:

>> On 1/24/23 05:24, Cupertino Miranda wrote:
>>> Thank you for the comments and suggestions.
>>> I have changed the patch.
>>> Unfortunately in case of rx target I could not make
>>> scan-assembler-symbol-section to match. I believe it is because the
>>> .section and .global entries order is reversed in this target.
>>> Patch in inlined below. looking forward to your comments.
>> Sorry for the long delays.   I've installed this version.
>>
>> As a follow-up, can you update the documentation in doc/sourcebuild.texi to
>> include the new check-effective-target test?
>
> Hi Jeff,
>
> Thank you for installing the patch.
> I have prepared the doc change you requested.
> Hopefully this is what you were expecting.
>
> Regards,
> Cupertino

Just realized previous patch was in incorrect placement alphabetically.
Please consider this one instead.

Cupertino

>From 2a4f87294ad0af037b80e13d67678e52bc382c95 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Cupertino Miranda <cupertino.mira...@oracle.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Mar 2023 17:45:14 +0000
Subject: [PATCH] Added item entry in docs for the new check_effective_target.

More precisely for:
 - check_effective_target_const_volatile_readonly_section
---
 gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi | 3 +++
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
index be4318221cc..f08893aeb02 100644
--- a/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
+++ b/gcc/doc/sourcebuild.texi
@@ -2774,6 +2774,9 @@ Target supports automatic stack alignment.
 @item branch_cost
 Target supports @option{-branch-cost=N}.
 
+@item const_volatile_readonly_section
+Target places const volatile variables in readonly sections.
+
 @item cxa_atexit
 Target uses @code{__cxa_atexit}.
 
-- 
2.38.1

Reply via email to