Hi!

On Thu, Mar 02, 2023 at 07:23:32PM +0100, Robin Dapp via Gcc-patches wrote:
> this patch changes SLP test expectations.  As we only vectorize when no
> more than one rgroup is present, no vectorization is performed.

This broke the tests, I'm seeing syntax errors:
ERROR: gcc.dg/vect/slp-3.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects: error executing dg-final: 
syntax error in target selector "target !  vect_partial_vectors || vect32  || 
s390_vx"
ERROR: gcc.dg/vect/slp-3.c: error executing dg-final: syntax error in target 
selector "target !  vect_partial_vectors || vect32  || s390_vx"
ERROR: gcc.dg/vect/slp-multitypes-11.c -flto -ffat-lto-objects: error executing 
dg-final: syntax error in target selector "target vect_unpack && 
vect_partial_vectors_usage_1 &&  ! s390_vx"
ERROR: gcc.dg/vect/slp-multitypes-11.c: error executing dg-final: syntax error 
in target selector "target vect_unpack && vect_partial_vectors_usage_1 &&  ! 
s390_vx"

The following patch fixes those.

Tested on x86_64-linux with
make check-gcc RUNTESTFLAGS="--target_board=unix\{-m32,-m64\} vect.exp='slp-3.c 
slp-multitypes-11.c'"
and committed to trunk as obvious.

2023-03-04  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        * gcc.dg/vect/slp-3.c: Fix up syntax errors in scan-tree-dump-times
        target selectors.
        * gcc.dg/vect/slp-multitypes-11.c: Likewise.

--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-3.c.jj        2023-03-03 16:08:17.707264399 
+0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-3.c   2023-03-04 10:35:04.670752344 +0100
@@ -141,8 +141,7 @@ int main (void)
   return 0;
 }
 
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 3 loops" 1 "vect" { target { 
! { vect_partial_vectors || vect32 } || s390_vx } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 4 loops" 1 "vect" { target { 
vect_partial_vectors || vect32 } && { ! s390_vx } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 3 "vect" { 
target { ! { vect_partial_vectors || vect32 } || s390_vx } } } }*/
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 3 loops" 1 "vect" { target { 
{ ! { vect_partial_vectors || vect32 } } || s390_vx } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 4 loops" 1 "vect" { target { 
{ vect_partial_vectors || vect32 } && { ! s390_vx } } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 3 "vect" { 
target { { ! { vect_partial_vectors || vect32 } } || s390_vx } } } } */
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 4 "vect" { 
target { vect_partial_vectors || vect32 } && { ! s390_vx } } } } */
-  
--- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-multitypes-11.c.jj    2023-03-03 
16:08:17.707264399 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/vect/slp-multitypes-11.c       2023-03-04 
10:39:39.195748813 +0100
@@ -50,6 +50,5 @@ int main (void)
 
 /* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorized 1 loops" 1 "vect"  { target 
vect_unpack } } } */
 /* The epilogues are vectorized using partial vectors.  */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1 "vect"  { 
target { vect_unpack && { {! vect_partial_vectors_usage_1 } || s390_vx } } 
xfail { vect_variable_length && vect_load_lanes } } } } */
-/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 "vect"  { 
target { vect_unpack && vect_partial_vectors_usage_1 && { ! s390_vx } } xfail { 
vect_variable_length && vect_load_lanes } } } } */
-  
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 1 "vect"  { 
target { vect_unpack && { { ! vect_partial_vectors_usage_1 } || s390_vx } } 
xfail { vect_variable_length && vect_load_lanes } } } } */
+/* { dg-final { scan-tree-dump-times "vectorizing stmts using SLP" 2 "vect"  { 
target { { vect_unpack && vect_partial_vectors_usage_1 } && { ! s390_vx } } 
xfail { vect_variable_length && vect_load_lanes } } } } */


        Jakub

Reply via email to