On Apr 18, 2012, at 9:57 AM, Bernhard Reutner-Fischer wrote: > Before actually pushing this, I ment to ask if we *want* to make > sure that we do not add superfluous cleanup-module calls in the > future (which would slow down testing needlessly)?
I'd run you script again in another 6 months, and once again in a year, that'd probably catch 99% of what a check would catch, and runs faster for 99% of the people. > Since i have not yet looked into the automatic warning myself i would > have hoped that you would not add more explicit cleanup-module calls but > i guess this will not really work out, long-term :) Sure it will, you remove the documentation for it (or make it clear when it isn't necessary), and beat everyone on the head that does it. Usually, you'd only have to bonk each person twice, then, you're done. I can't imagine more than 30 bonks would be necessary to train them up. :-)
