On 04/18/2012 06:14 PM, Richard Earnshaw wrote: > On 18/04/12 16:37, Thomas Schwinge wrote: >> gcc/testsuite/ >> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/20030922-1.c: Compile with >> -fno-strict-volatile-bitfields. >> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/foldconst-3.c: Likewise. >> * gcc.dg/tree-ssa/vrp15.c: Likewise. >> > > None of these have any volatile bitfields, so the option should be a no-op.
The problem is that we have to treat normal bitfields differently as well, since a variable may later be declared as volatile. Bernd
