On 2/28/23 02:10, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote:
On Sun, 26 Feb 2023, Jonathan Yong via Gcc-patches wrote:
Patch OK for master branch? I did not see any obvious issues to exclude LLP64
specifically.
I see "lp64 || lp64" in that patch (which should preferably have
been sent inline, as it's harder to quote an attached patch,
QED). Sending the wrong version? Don't forget to test it.
brgds, H-P
Corrected, previous patch was manually applied from a corrupted patch file.
From 52b1209193260a624f90c3ca759a83b975c2e8e0 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Jonathan Yong <10wa...@gmail.com>
Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2023 06:34:04 +0000
Subject: [PATCH 4/7] gcc.c-torture/compile/103818.c: enable for llp64 too
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* gcc.c-torture/compile/103818.c: enable test for llp64.
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Yong <10wa...@gmail.com>
---
gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/103818.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/103818.c b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/103818.c
index e6cbe7860cf..57f56b6c09d 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/103818.c
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/gcc.c-torture/compile/103818.c
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
-/* { dg-do compile { target lp64 } } */
+/* { dg-do compile { target { lp64 || llp64 } } } */
struct A { int b[1]; };
void
--
2.39.2
