> From: Mike Stump <mikest...@comcast.net>
> Date: Mon, 27 Feb 2023 09:41:18 -0800
> > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/lib/multiline.exp
> > b/gcc/testsuite/lib/multiline.exp
> > index 84ba9216642e..5eccf2bbebc1 100644
> > --- a/gcc/testsuite/lib/multiline.exp
> > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/lib/multiline.exp
>
> > - ${maybe_x}pass "$title was found: \"$escaped_regex\""
> > + ${maybe_x}pass "$title was found"
> > } else {
> > - ${maybe_x}fail "$title not found: \"$escaped_regex\""
> > + ${maybe_x}fail "$title not found"
>
> Side remark:
>
> So, the string on pass and the string on fail are supposed
> to be exactly the same. Regression analysis works only if
> the string is the same. "regexp test", might be
> suggestive enough and can be the same spelling for both.
Right. Should I changed it now?
(Pro: see above. Con: again meddling with regression-test history.)
Like (editing on the fly here) as the "found" part seems
redundant:
> > - ${maybe_x}pass "$title was found"
> > + ${maybe_x}pass "$title"
> > } else {
> > - ${maybe_x}fail "$title not found"
> > + ${maybe_x}fail "$title"
brgds, H-P
