Uros Bizjak <ubiz...@gmail.com> writes: > On Fri, Feb 17, 2023 at 8:38 AM Richard Biener <rguent...@suse.de> wrote: >> >> On Thu, 16 Feb 2023, Uros Bizjak wrote: >> >> > simplify_subreg can return VOIDmode const_int operand and will >> > cause ICE in simplify_gen_subreg when this operand is passed to it. >> > >> > The patch prevents VOIDmode temporary from entering simplify_gen_subreg. >> > We can't process const_int operand any further, since outermode >> > is not an integer mode here. >> >> But if it's a CONST_INT then we know it's of int_outermode, no? That is, >> doesn't simplify_subreg (mode, ...) always return something in 'mode' >> and thus we can always pass just 'mode' as third argument to the >> following simplify_gen_subreg call? > > You are right. I am testing the attached patch that works too.
Thanks for this, it's the correct fix. But as noted in https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/610920.html, the final 0 is also wrong for big-endian. Andre? Richard > > Uros. > > diff --git a/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc b/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc > index 0a1dd88b0a8..3955929bb70 100644 > --- a/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc > +++ b/gcc/simplify-rtx.cc > @@ -7665,7 +7665,7 @@ simplify_context::simplify_subreg (machine_mode > outermode, rtx op, > { > rtx tem = simplify_subreg (int_outermode, op, innermode, byte); > if (tem) > - return simplify_gen_subreg (outermode, tem, GET_MODE (tem), 0); > + return simplify_gen_subreg (outermode, tem, int_outermode, 0); > } > > /* If OP is a vector comparison and the subreg is not changing the