On Feb 23, 2023, Richard Earnshaw <richard.earns...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
> On 22/02/2023 19:57, Alexandre Oliva wrote:
>> On Feb 21, 2023, Richard Earnshaw <richard.earns...@foss.arm.com> wrote:
>>
>>> Rather than scanning for the triplet, a better test would be
>>
>>> { xfail { arm_eabi } }
>>
>> Indeed, thanks. Here's the updated patch, retested. Ok to install?
> Based on Nathan's comments, we should just skip the test on arm_eabi,
> it's simply not applicable.
Like this, I suppose. Retested on x86_64-linux-gnu (trunk) and
arm-wrs-vxworks7 (gcc-12). Ok to install?
[PR105224] C++ modules and AAPCS/ARM EABI clash on inline key methods
From: Alexandre Oliva <ol...@adacore.com>
g++.dg/modules/virt-2_a.C fails on arm-eabi and many other arm targets
that use the AAPCS variant. ARM is the only target that overrides
TARGET_CXX_KEY_METHOD_MAY_BE_INLINE. It's not clear to me which way
the clash between AAPCS and C++ Modules design should be resolved, but
currently it favors AAPCS and thus the test fails, so skip it on
arm_eabi.
for gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog
PR c++/105224
* g++.dg/modules/virt-2_a.C: Skip on arm_eabi.
---
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/virt-2_a.C | 4 +++-
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/virt-2_a.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/virt-2_a.C
index 580552be5a0d8..8fa42d97d72d7 100644
--- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/virt-2_a.C
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/modules/virt-2_a.C
@@ -1,4 +1,6 @@
-// { dg-module-do run }
+// AAPCS overrides TARGET_CXX_KEY_METHOD_MAY_BE_INLINE,
+// in a way that invalidates this test.
+// { dg-module-do run { target { ! arm_eabi } } }
// { dg-additional-options -fmodules-ts }
export module foo;
// { dg-module-cmi foo }
--
Alexandre Oliva, happy hacker https://FSFLA.org/blogs/lxo/
Free Software Activist GNU Toolchain Engineer
Disinformation flourishes because many people care deeply about injustice
but very few check the facts. Ask me about <https://stallmansupport.org>
