On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 11:47:54AM +0100, Jakub Jelinek via Gcc-patches wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 16, 2023 at 10:30:30AM +0000, Jonathan Wakely via Gcc-patches
> wrote:
> > Tested powerpc64le-linux. Pushed to trunk.
> >
> > These should be backported too.
> >
> > -- >8 --
> >
> > The non-reserved names 'val' and 'dest' were being used in our headers
> > but haven't been added to the 17_intro/names.cc test. That's because
> > they are used by <asm-generic/posix_types.h> and <netinet/tcp.h>
> > respecitvely on glibc-based systems.
>
> So, can't we for such problematic names add hacks, like some directory
> which the test adds as -isystem before the standard ones and contains
Or do it the way you just did for PSTL, by including all the non-libstdc++
headers used in libstdc++ headers before defining all the macros for the
non-reserved names, hopefully the system headers use include guards and
won't be included again.
Jakub
