Hi!

get_available_features doesn't depend on cpu_model2->__cpu_{family,model}
and just sets stuff up based on CPUID leaf 1, or some extended ones,
so I wonder why are we calling it separately for Intel, AMD and Zhaoxin
and not for all other CPUs too?  I think various programs in the wild
which aren't using __builtin_cpu_{is,supports} just check the various CPUID
leafs and query bits in there, without blacklisting unknown CPU vendors,
so I think even __builtin_cpu_supports ("sse2") etc. should be reliable
if those VENDOR_{CENTAUR,CYRIX,NSC,OTHER} CPUs set those bits in CPUID leaf
1 or some extended ones.  Calling it for all CPUs also means it can be
inlined because there will be just a single caller.

I will test on Intel but can't test it on non-Intel (or with some extra
effort on AMD; for both of those arches it should be really no change in
behavior).

Thoughts on this?

2023-02-09  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>

        PR target/100758
        * common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h (get_zhaoxin_cpu): Formatting fixes.
        (cpu_indicator_init): Call get_available_features for all CPUs with
        max_level >= 1, rather than just Intel, AMD or Zhaoxin.  Formatting
        fixes.

--- gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h.jj 2023-01-16 11:52:15.910736614 +0100
+++ gcc/common/config/i386/cpuinfo.h    2023-02-09 12:51:23.539470140 +0100
@@ -601,8 +601,8 @@ get_intel_cpu (struct __processor_model
 
 static inline const char *
 get_zhaoxin_cpu (struct __processor_model *cpu_model,
-               struct __processor_model2 *cpu_model2,
-               unsigned int *cpu_features2)
+                struct __processor_model2 *cpu_model2,
+                unsigned int *cpu_features2)
 {
   const char *cpu = NULL;
   unsigned int family = cpu_model2->__cpu_family;
@@ -1016,6 +1016,10 @@ cpu_indicator_init (struct __processor_m
   extended_model = (eax >> 12) & 0xf0;
   extended_family = (eax >> 20) & 0xff;
 
+  /* Find available features. */
+  get_available_features (cpu_model, cpu_model2, cpu_features2,
+                         ecx, edx);
+
   if (vendor == signature_INTEL_ebx)
     {
       /* Adjust model and family for Intel CPUS. */
@@ -1030,9 +1034,6 @@ cpu_indicator_init (struct __processor_m
       cpu_model2->__cpu_family = family;
       cpu_model2->__cpu_model = model;
 
-      /* Find available features. */
-      get_available_features (cpu_model, cpu_model2, cpu_features2,
-                             ecx, edx);
       /* Get CPU type.  */
       get_intel_cpu (cpu_model, cpu_model2, cpu_features2);
       cpu_model->__cpu_vendor = VENDOR_INTEL;
@@ -1049,9 +1050,6 @@ cpu_indicator_init (struct __processor_m
       cpu_model2->__cpu_family = family;
       cpu_model2->__cpu_model = model;
 
-      /* Find available features. */
-      get_available_features (cpu_model, cpu_model2, cpu_features2,
-                             ecx, edx);
       /* Get CPU type.  */
       get_amd_cpu (cpu_model, cpu_model2, cpu_features2);
       cpu_model->__cpu_vendor = VENDOR_AMD;
@@ -1059,22 +1057,17 @@ cpu_indicator_init (struct __processor_m
   else if (vendor == signature_CENTAUR_ebx && family < 0x07)
     cpu_model->__cpu_vendor = VENDOR_CENTAUR;
   else if (vendor == signature_SHANGHAI_ebx
-               || vendor == signature_CENTAUR_ebx)
+          || vendor == signature_CENTAUR_ebx)
     {
       /* Adjust model and family for ZHAOXIN CPUS.  */
       if (family == 0x07)
-       {
-         model += extended_model;
-       }
+       model += extended_model;
 
       cpu_model2->__cpu_family = family;
       cpu_model2->__cpu_model = model;
 
-      /* Find available features.  */
-      get_available_features (cpu_model, cpu_model2, cpu_features2,
-                                 ecx, edx);
       /* Get CPU type.  */
-      get_zhaoxin_cpu (cpu_model, cpu_model2,cpu_features2);
+      get_zhaoxin_cpu (cpu_model, cpu_model2, cpu_features2);
       cpu_model->__cpu_vendor = VENDOR_ZHAOXIN;
     }
   else if (vendor == signature_CYRIX_ebx)

        Jakub

Reply via email to