> Hi!
> 
> As discussed in the PR, returns_twice functions are rare/special beasts
> that need special treatment in the cfg, and inside of their bodies
> we don't know which part actually works the weird returns twice way
> (either in the fork/vfork sense, or in the setjmp) and aren't updating
> ab edges to reflect that.
> 
> I think easiest is just to never split these, like we already never
> split noreturn or malloc functions.

I think so too - anyone who puts returns twice function on the hot path
should be punished.
> 
> Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-linux and i686-linux, ok for trunk?
> 
> 2023-02-07  Jakub Jelinek  <ja...@redhat.com>
> 
>       PR tree-optimization/106923
>       * ipa-split.cc (execute_split_functions): Don't split returns_twice
>       functions.
> 
>       * gcc.dg/pr106923.c: New test.
OK,
Thanks!
Honza
> 
> --- gcc/ipa-split.cc.jj       2023-01-02 09:32:22.492283737 +0100
> +++ gcc/ipa-split.cc  2023-02-06 14:15:08.343271251 +0100
> @@ -1715,10 +1715,11 @@ execute_split_functions (void)
>    struct cgraph_node *node = cgraph_node::get (current_function_decl);
>  
>    if (flags_from_decl_or_type (current_function_decl)
> -      & (ECF_NORETURN|ECF_MALLOC))
> +      & (ECF_NORETURN|ECF_MALLOC|ECF_RETURNS_TWICE))
>      {
>        if (dump_file)
> -     fprintf (dump_file, "Not splitting: noreturn/malloc function.\n");
> +     fprintf (dump_file, "Not splitting: noreturn/malloc/returns_twice "
> +                         "function.\n");
>        return 0;
>      }
>    if (MAIN_NAME_P (DECL_NAME (current_function_decl)))
> --- gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106923.c.jj        2023-02-06 14:19:33.464449400 
> +0100
> +++ gcc/testsuite/gcc.dg/pr106923.c   2023-02-06 14:18:25.498429162 +0100
> @@ -0,0 +1,23 @@
> +/* PR tree-optimization/106923 */
> +/* { dg-do compile } */
> +/* { dg-options "-O1 -finline-small-functions -fpartial-inlining --param 
> max-inline-insns-single=1 --param uninlined-function-insns=10000" } */
> +
> +int n;
> +
> +int
> +baz (void);
> +
> +__attribute__ ((returns_twice)) int
> +bar (void)
> +{
> +  if (baz ())
> +    ++n;
> +
> +  return 0;
> +}
> +
> +int
> +foo (void)
> +{
> +  return bar ();
> +}
> 
>       Jakub
> 

Reply via email to