Hi!
Seems when committing the PR108525 fix I've missed that a test with
the same name had been added a few hours before for PR108526.
This patch separates the PR108525 test into a new file.
Tested on x86_64-linux, committed to trunk as obvious.
2023-02-08 Jakub Jelinek <ja...@redhat.com>
PR c++/108525
* g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call5.C: Move PR108525 testcase
incorrectly applied into PR108526 testcase ...
* g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call6.C: ... here. New test.
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call5.C.jj 2023-01-25
15:13:23.653643155 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call5.C 2023-02-08
13:52:17.273674484 +0100
@@ -1,8 +1,3 @@
-// PR c++/108525
-// { dg-do compile { target c++23 } }
-
-auto b = [](...) static { return 1; };
-auto foo () { return b (); }
// PR c++/108526
// { dg-do compile { target c++23 } }
--- gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call6.C.jj 2023-02-08
13:51:53.856022995 +0100
+++ gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp23/static-operator-call6.C 2023-02-08
13:52:06.831829883 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,5 @@
+// PR c++/108525
+// { dg-do compile { target c++23 } }
+
+auto b = [](...) static { return 1; };
+auto foo () { return b (); }
Jakub
