> From: Aldy Hernandez <al...@redhat.com> > Date: Tue, 7 Feb 2023 17:52:02 +0100
> Up to the release managers, but I have no objections. I take it that's for both patches. Thanks! (Potential reviewers: these patches are local to the testsuite.) brgds, H-P > > Aldy > > On 2/7/23 17:50, Hans-Peter Nilsson wrote: > > (sort-of-ping:) Aldy, I missed CC:ing you on the similar > > https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-February/611206.html > > would you mind having a look? > > > > Tested native x86_64-pc-linux-gnu (w/wo. -m32) and cris-elf. > > Ok to commit? > > > > ---- 8< ---- > > There was a commit r13-2082-gbf13a13c65bd06 "c++: remove some xfails" > > (not referencing the PR) that dealt with part of the PR, but didn't > > xfail the ilp32-specific (bogus) warning mentioned in the PR. > > > > PR testsuite/106120 > > * g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C:144 XFAIL bogus warning for > > ilp32 targets with c++98. > > --- > > gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C | 2 +- > > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > > > diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C > > b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C > > index 3716d2d13be0..35fb59e02320 100644 > > --- a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C > > +++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/warn/Wstringop-overflow-4.C > > @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ void test_strcpy_new_int16_t (size_t n, const size_t > > vals[]) > > > > int r_imin_imax = SR (INT_MIN, INT_MAX); > > T (S (1), new int16_t[r_imin_imax]); > > - T (S (2), new int16_t[r_imin_imax + 1]); > > + T (S (2), new int16_t[r_imin_imax + 1]); // { dg-bogus "into a region of > > size" "pr106120" { xfail { ilp32 && c++98_only } } } > > T (S (9), new int16_t[r_imin_imax * 2 + 1]); > > > > int r_0_imax = SR (0, INT_MAX); >
