The new __dmr type that is being added as a possible future PowerPC instruction
set bumps into a structure field size issue.  The size of the __dmr type is 
1024 bits.
The precision field in tree_type_common is currently 10 bits, so if you store
1,024 into field, you get a 0 back.  When you get 0 in the precision field, the
ccp pass passes this 0 to sext_hwi in hwint.h.  That function in turn generates
a shift that is equal to the host wide int bit size, which is undefined as
machine dependent for shifting in C/C++.

      int shift = HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT - prec;
      return ((HOST_WIDE_INT) ((unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT) src << shift)) >> shift;

It turns out the x86_64 where I first did my tests returns the original input
before the two shifts, while the PowerPC always returns 0.  In the ccp pass, the
original input is -1, and so it worked.  When I did the runs on the PowerPC, the
result was 0, which ultimately led to the failure.

In addition, once the precision field is larger, it will help PR C/102989 (C2x
_BigInt) as well as the implementation of the SET_TYPE_VECTOR_SUBPARTS macro.

I bootstraped various PowerPC compilers (power10 LE, power9 LE, power8 BE)
along with an x86_64 build.  There were no regressions.  My proposed patches
for the __dmr type now run fine.  Can I install this into the master branch for
GCC 13?

2023-02-02   Richard Biener  <rguent...@suse.de>
             Michael Meissner  <meiss...@linux.ibm.com>

gcc/

        PR middle-end/108623
        * hwint.h (sext_hwi): Add assertion against precision 0.
        * tree-core.h (tree_type_common): Bump up precision field to 16 bits.
        Align bit fields > 1 bit to at least an 8-bit boundary.
---
 gcc/hwint.h     |  1 +
 gcc/tree-core.h | 24 ++++++++++++------------
 2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/hwint.h b/gcc/hwint.h
index e31aa006fa4..ba92efbfc25 100644
--- a/gcc/hwint.h
+++ b/gcc/hwint.h
@@ -277,6 +277,7 @@ ctz_or_zero (unsigned HOST_WIDE_INT x)
 static inline HOST_WIDE_INT
 sext_hwi (HOST_WIDE_INT src, unsigned int prec)
 {
+  gcc_checking_assert (prec != 0);
   if (prec == HOST_BITS_PER_WIDE_INT)
     return src;
   else
diff --git a/gcc/tree-core.h b/gcc/tree-core.h
index 8124a1328d4..b71748c6c02 100644
--- a/gcc/tree-core.h
+++ b/gcc/tree-core.h
@@ -1686,18 +1686,8 @@ struct GTY(()) tree_type_common {
   tree attributes;
   unsigned int uid;
 
-  unsigned int precision : 10;
-  unsigned no_force_blk_flag : 1;
-  unsigned needs_constructing_flag : 1;
-  unsigned transparent_aggr_flag : 1;
-  unsigned restrict_flag : 1;
-  unsigned contains_placeholder_bits : 2;
-
+  unsigned int precision : 16;
   ENUM_BITFIELD(machine_mode) mode : 8;
-
-  /* TYPE_STRING_FLAG for INTEGER_TYPE and ARRAY_TYPE.
-     TYPE_CXX_ODR_P for RECORD_TYPE and UNION_TYPE.  */
-  unsigned string_flag : 1;
   unsigned lang_flag_0 : 1;
   unsigned lang_flag_1 : 1;
   unsigned lang_flag_2 : 1;
@@ -1713,12 +1703,22 @@ struct GTY(()) tree_type_common {
      so we need to store the value 32 (not 31, as we need the zero
      as well), hence six bits.  */
   unsigned align : 6;
+  /* TYPE_STRING_FLAG for INTEGER_TYPE and ARRAY_TYPE.
+     TYPE_CXX_ODR_P for RECORD_TYPE and UNION_TYPE.  */
+  unsigned string_flag : 1;
+  unsigned no_force_blk_flag : 1;
+
   unsigned warn_if_not_align : 6;
+  unsigned needs_constructing_flag : 1;
+  unsigned transparent_aggr_flag : 1;
+
+  unsigned contains_placeholder_bits : 2;
+  unsigned restrict_flag : 1;
   unsigned typeless_storage : 1;
   unsigned empty_flag : 1;
   unsigned indivisible_p : 1;
   unsigned no_named_args_stdarg_p : 1;
-  unsigned spare : 15;
+  unsigned spare : 9;
 
   alias_set_type alias_set;
   tree pointer_to;
-- 
2.39.1


-- 
Michael Meissner, IBM
PO Box 98, Ayer, Massachusetts, USA, 01432
email: meiss...@linux.ibm.com

Reply via email to