In this test case, we find ourselves evaluating 't' which is
((const struct carray *) this)->data_[VIEW_CONVERT_EXPR<long int>(index)]
in cxx_eval_array_reference. ctx->object is non-null, a RESULT_DECL, so
we replace it with 't':
new_ctx.object = t; // result_decl replaced
and then we go to cxx_eval_constant_expression to evaluate an
AGGR_INIT_EXPR, where we end up evaluating an INIT_EXPR (which is in the
body of the constructor for seed_or_index):
((struct seed_or_index *) this)->value_ = NON_LVALUE_EXPR <0>
whereupon in cxx_eval_store_expression we go to the probe loop
where the 'this' is evaluated to
ze_set.tables_.first_table_.data_[0]
so the 'object' is ze_set, but that isn't in ctx->global->get_value_ptr
so we fail with a bogus error. ze_set is not there because it comes
from a different constexpr context (it's not in cv_cache either).
The problem started with r12-2304 where I added the new_ctx.object
replacement. That was to prevent a type mismatch: the type of 't'
and ctx.object were different.
It seems clear that we shouldn't have replaced ctx.object here.
The cxx_eval_array_reference I mentioned earlier is called from
cxx_eval_store_expression:
6257 init = cxx_eval_constant_expression (&new_ctx, init, vc_prvalue,
6258 non_constant_p, overflow_p);
which already created a new context, whose .object we should be
using unless, for instance, INIT contained a.b and we're evaluating
the 'a' part, which I think was the case for r12-2304; in that case
ctx.object has to be something different.
A relatively safe fix should be to check the types before replacing
ctx.object, as in the below.
Bootstrapped/regtested on x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, ok for trunk?
PR c++/108158
gcc/cp/ChangeLog:
* constexpr.cc (cxx_eval_array_reference): Don't replace
new_ctx.object if its type is the same as elem_type.
gcc/testsuite/ChangeLog:
* g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-108158.C: New test.
---
gcc/cp/constexpr.cc | 8 +++--
gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-108158.C | 32 +++++++++++++++++++
2 files changed, 38 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
create mode 100644 gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-108158.C
diff --git a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
index be99bec17e7..00582cfffe2 100644
--- a/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
+++ b/gcc/cp/constexpr.cc
@@ -4301,9 +4301,13 @@ cxx_eval_array_reference (const constexpr_ctx *ctx, tree
t,
if (!SCALAR_TYPE_P (elem_type))
{
new_ctx = *ctx;
- if (ctx->object)
+ if (ctx->object
+ && !same_type_ignoring_top_level_qualifiers_p
+ (elem_type, TREE_TYPE (ctx->object)))
/* If there was no object, don't add one: it could confuse us
- into thinking we're modifying a const object. */
+ into thinking we're modifying a const object. Similarly, if
+ the types are the same, replacing .object could lead to a
+ failure to evaluate it (c++/108158). */
new_ctx.object = t;
new_ctx.ctor = build_constructor (elem_type, NULL);
ctx = &new_ctx;
diff --git a/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-108158.C
b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-108158.C
new file mode 100644
index 00000000000..e5f5e9954e5
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gcc/testsuite/g++.dg/cpp1y/constexpr-108158.C
@@ -0,0 +1,32 @@
+// PR c++/108158
+// { dg-do compile { target c++14 } }
+
+template <class T, int N> struct carray {
+ T data_[N]{};
+ constexpr T operator[](long index) const { return data_[index]; }
+};
+struct seed_or_index {
+private:
+ long value_ = 0;
+};
+template <int M> struct pmh_tables {
+ carray<seed_or_index, M> first_table_;
+ template <typename KeyType, typename HasherType>
+ constexpr void lookup(KeyType, HasherType) const {
+ first_table_[0];
+ }
+};
+template <int N> struct unordered_set {
+ int equal_;
+ carray<int, N> keys_;
+ pmh_tables<N> tables_;
+ constexpr unordered_set() : equal_{} {}
+ template <class KeyType, class Hasher>
+ constexpr auto lookup(KeyType key, Hasher hash) const {
+ tables_.lookup(key, hash);
+ return keys_;
+ }
+};
+constexpr unordered_set<3> ze_set;
+constexpr auto nocount = ze_set.lookup(4, int());
+constexpr auto nocount2 = unordered_set<3>{}.lookup(4, int());
base-commit: 897a0502056e6cc6613f26e0b22d1c1e06b1490f
--
2.39.1
