Hello,
I have committed a fix [1] into gcc trunk for a build issue mentioned in
pr108505 and
latter received few upstream comments proposing more robust fix for this issue.
In this patch I'm addressing those comments and sending this as a followup
patch.
Regression tested on arm-none-eabi target and found no regressions.
Ok for master?
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/pipermail/gcc-patches/2023-January/610513.html
Regards,
Srinath.
gcc/ChangeLog:
2023-01-27 Srinath Parvathaneni <[email protected]>
PR target/108505
* config.gcc (tm_mlib_file): Define new variable.
############### Attachment also inlined for ease of reply ###############
diff --git a/gcc/config.gcc b/gcc/config.gcc
index
89f56047cfe3126bc6c8e90c8b4840dea13538f9..2aab92bbfd8b4088259ebf9b565af8e8bbef1122
100644
--- a/gcc/config.gcc
+++ b/gcc/config.gcc
@@ -4355,6 +4355,7 @@ case "${target}" in
case ${arm_multilib} in
aprofile|rmprofile)
tmake_profile_file="arm/t-multilib"
+ tm_mlib_file="arm/arm-mlib.h"
;;
@*)
ml=`echo "X$arm_multilib" | sed
'1s,^X@,,'`
@@ -4393,7 +4394,7 @@ case "${target}" in
# through to the multilib selector
with_float="soft"
tmake_file="${tmake_file} ${tmake_profile_file}"
- tm_file="$tm_file arm/arm-mlib.h"
+ tm_file="$tm_file $tm_mlib_file"
TM_MULTILIB_CONFIG="$with_multilib_list"
fi
fi
diff --git a/gcc/config.gcc b/gcc/config.gcc
index
89f56047cfe3126bc6c8e90c8b4840dea13538f9..2aab92bbfd8b4088259ebf9b565af8e8bbef1122
100644
--- a/gcc/config.gcc
+++ b/gcc/config.gcc
@@ -4355,6 +4355,7 @@ case "${target}" in
case ${arm_multilib} in
aprofile|rmprofile)
tmake_profile_file="arm/t-multilib"
+ tm_mlib_file="arm/arm-mlib.h"
;;
@*)
ml=`echo "X$arm_multilib" | sed
'1s,^X@,,'`
@@ -4393,7 +4394,7 @@ case "${target}" in
# through to the multilib selector
with_float="soft"
tmake_file="${tmake_file} ${tmake_profile_file}"
- tm_file="$tm_file arm/arm-mlib.h"
+ tm_file="$tm_file $tm_mlib_file"
TM_MULTILIB_CONFIG="$with_multilib_list"
fi
fi
