[PATCH] RISC-V: Rename insn into rinsn for rtx_insn *

[juzhe . zhong]

From: Ju-Zhe Zhong <juzhe.zh...@rivai.ai>

Since the PASS is implemented base on RTL_SSA framework.
According to rtl_ssa, they name insn_info * as insn and
name rtx_insn * rinsn. I follow this rule in this pass but I missed
this function. So rename it to make codes be consistent to RTL_SSA
framework.

gcc/ChangeLog:

        * config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc (add_label_notes):

---
 gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc | 10 +++++-----
 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
index a972c49561a..3c920779992 100644
--- a/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
+++ b/gcc/config/riscv/riscv-vsetvl.cc
@@ -682,7 +682,7 @@ insert_vsetvl (enum emit_type emit_type, rtx_insn *rinsn,
    necessary REG_LABEL_OPERAND and REG_LABEL_TARGET notes.  */
 
 static void
-add_label_notes (rtx x, rtx_insn *insn)
+add_label_notes (rtx x, rtx_insn *rinsn)
 {
   enum rtx_code code = GET_CODE (x);
   int i, j;
@@ -699,8 +699,8 @@ add_label_notes (rtx x, rtx_insn *insn)
       /* There's no reason for current users to emit jump-insns with
         such a LABEL_REF, so we don't have to handle REG_LABEL_TARGET
         notes.  */
-      gcc_assert (!JUMP_P (insn));
-      add_reg_note (insn, REG_LABEL_OPERAND, label_ref_label (x));
+      gcc_assert (!JUMP_P (rinsn));
+      add_reg_note (rinsn, REG_LABEL_OPERAND, label_ref_label (x));
 
       if (LABEL_P (label_ref_label (x)))
        LABEL_NUSES (label_ref_label (x))++;
@@ -711,10 +711,10 @@ add_label_notes (rtx x, rtx_insn *insn)
   for (i = GET_RTX_LENGTH (code) - 1, fmt = GET_RTX_FORMAT (code); i >= 0; i--)
     {
       if (fmt[i] == 'e')
-       add_label_notes (XEXP (x, i), insn);
+       add_label_notes (XEXP (x, i), rinsn);
       else if (fmt[i] == 'E')
        for (j = XVECLEN (x, i) - 1; j >= 0; j--)
-         add_label_notes (XVECEXP (x, i, j), insn);
+         add_label_notes (XVECEXP (x, i, j), rinsn);
     }
 }
 
-- 
2.36.1